Crenças de professores em formação sobre o uso de Quadros interativos de baixo custo
PDF ()
HTML (Español (España))

Palavras-chave

Informática educacional
modelo educacional
educação assistida por computador
fratura digital
projeto de pesquisa educaciona

Como Citar

Reyes-González, D., García Cartagena, Y., & Rojas Castro, P. (2019). Crenças de professores em formação sobre o uso de Quadros interativos de baixo custo. Ciencia, Docencia Y Tecnología, 30(58 may-oct), 158–181. https://doi.org/10.33255/3058/479

Resumo

Esta pesquisa utiliza o instrumento qualitativo da Teoria do Comportamento Planejado (TPB) para obter as crenças sobre a implementação pedagógica de um dispositivo de interface humana semelhante aos quadros digitais interativos. O instrumento foi aplicado a estudantes de pedagogia que participaram de um curso sobre o uso técnico e pedagógico de quadros digitais. O conjunto de respostas foi submetido a uma análise de conteúdo gerando categorias de crenças no campo dos fatores pessoais, contextuais e de controle, que seriam mediadores em sua implementação. Posteriormente, foram utilizados critérios quantitativos para selecionar as crenças que farão parte do instrumento metodológico principal de TPB. No total, dezesseis crenças foram selecionadas de acordo com um critério que inclui tanto a cobertura de sujeitos quanto a quantidade de crenças e que compõem o conjunto modal. Essas crenças são usadas para projetar uma estrutura que visa o treinamento de professores em formação.
https://doi.org/10.33255/3058/479
PDF ()
HTML (Español (España))

Referências

Ajzen, I., 2005. Attitudes, personality and behavior, 2 edition. ed. Open University Press, Maidenhead.

Ajzen, I., 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Theories of Cognitive Self-Regulation 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Ajzen, I., 1985. From intentions to actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior, in: Kuhl, J., Beckmann, J. (Eds.), Action Control, SSSP Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 11–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2

Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., 2000. Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes. European Review of Social Psychology 11, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779943000116

Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., Heilbroner, R.L., 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Edición: Revised. ed. Pearson Education., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

Albirini, A., 2006. Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: the case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education 47, 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.013

Aldunate, R., Nussbaum, M., 2013. Teacher adoption of technology. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 519–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.017

Anderson, T., Poellhuber, B., McKerlich, R., 2010. Self paced learners meet social software: An exploration of eearners’ attitudes, expectations and experience. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 13.

Beauchamp, G., Kennewell, S., 2010. Interactivity in the classroom and its impact on learning. Computers & Education, Learning in Digital Worlds: Selected Contributions from the CAL 09 Conference 54, 759–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.033

Cassany, D., Carles, S.L., 2017. La digitalización del aula de ciencias: creencias y prácticas. Digital Education Review 93–115.

Chen, T.-L., Chen, T.-J., 2006. Examination of attitudes towards teaching online courses based on theory of reasoned action of university faculty in Taiwan. British Journal of Educational Technology 37, 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00590.x

Ekizoglu, N., Ozcinar, Z., 2011. A study of developing an anxiety scale towards the internet. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3rd World Conference on Educational Sciences - 2011 15, 3902–3911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.392

Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., 2011. Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach, Taylor & Francis. ed. Psychology Press, New York.

Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., 1975. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research, Addison-Wesley series in social psychology. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., MA.

Francis, J.J., University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Centre for Health Services Research, 2004. Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour: a manual for health services researchers. Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne.

French, D.P., Sutton, S., Hennings, S.J., Mitchell, J., Wareham, N.J., Griffin, S., Hardeman, W., Kinmonth, A.L., 2005. The importance of affective beliefs and attitudes in the Theory of Planned Behavior: Predicting intention to increase physical activity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 35, 1824–1848. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02197.x

García, Y., Reyes-González, D., Rojas, P., 2012. Pizarras digitales e interactividad en el aula: estilos de uso y principales factores que afectan su adopción. Educación y Tecnología 0, 69–81.

Haney, J.J., Czerniak, C.M., Lumpe, A.T., 1996. Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33, 971–993. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199611)33:9<971::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-S

Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., Brindley, S., 2005. Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies 37, 155–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000276961

Herath, C.S., 2010. Eliciting salient beliefs are critical to predict behavioural change in theory of planned behaviour. E-psychologie (E-psychology) 4, 24–36.

Holzinger, A., Softic, S., Stickel, C., Ebner, M., Debevc, M., 2009. Intuitive e-teaching by using combined HCI devices: Experiences with wiimote applications, in: Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Services, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Presented at the International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02713-0_5

Kitchen, S., Mackenzie, H., Butt, S., Finch, S., 2006. Evaluation of curriculum online report of the third survey of schools. Becta ICT Research.

Lee, J.C., 2008. Hacking the Nintendo Wii Remote. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7, 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2008.53

Lee, J.C., Hudson, S.E., Summet, J.W., Dietz, P.H., 2005. Moveable interactive projected displays using projector based tracking, in: Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST ’05. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1145/1095034.1095045

Lim, C.P., Chan, B.C., 2007. microLESSONS in teacher education: Examining pre-service teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. Computers & Education 48, 474–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.03.005

López, O.S., 2010. The Digital Learning Classroom: Improving English Language Learners’ academic success in mathematics and reading using interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education 54, 901–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.019

Mata, L., Lazar, G., Lazar, I., 2016. Effects of study levels on students’ attitudes towards interactive whiteboards in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior 54, 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.044

Niederhauser, D.S., Stoddart, T., 2001. Teachers’ instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and Teacher Education 17, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00036-6

Perea, C.D., 2011. Creación de objetos de enseñanza y aprendizaje mediante el uso didáctico de la pizarra digital interactiva (PDI). Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS) 12, 116–143.

Reyes-González, D., Martín García, A.V., 2008. Creencias de los docentes de formación inicial sobre las tecnologías infocomunicacionales. Una aproximación desde la Teoría del Comportamiento Planificado, in: EUniverSALearning 08: II Congreso Internacional de Tecnología, Formación y Comunicación. Salamanca, España.

Reyes-González, D., Martín-García, A.V., 2016. Creencias de docentes en formación que afectan el uso de recursos tecnológicos. Ciencia, Docencia y Tecnología 27, 293–314.

Reyes-González, D., Rojas, P., García, Y., 2011. Diseño y desarrollo de Dispositivo de Interfaz Humana (DIH) de bajo costo y como alternativa a las Pizarras Digitales. Presented at the 1o Jornadas de Investigación DIUMCE, UMCE, Santiago de Chile.

Rodríguez, P., Nussbaum, M., Dombrovskaia, L., 2012. Evolutionary development: a model for the design, implementation, and evaluation of ICT for education programmes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 28, 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00419.x

Rojas, P., Reyes-González, D., García, Y., 2011. Interactividad y pizarras digitales en espacios formativos, in: Garzón Clemente, R., Román Julián, R., Solís Muñiz, A., González Scarpulli, D. (Eds.), Tecnologías de La Información y La Comunicación En La Educación: Aportes Desde Una Perspectiva Iberoamericana. Chiapas, México.

Scrimshaw, P., 2004. Enabling teachers to make successful use of ICT. Becta ICT Research.

Sugar, W., Crawley, F., Fine, B., 2005. Critiquing Theory of Planned Behaviour as a method to assess teachers’ technology integration attitudes. British Journal of Educational Technology 36, 331–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00462.x

Sugar, W., Crawley, F., Fine, B., 2004. Examining teachers’ decisions to adopt new technology. Educational Technology & Society 7, 201–2013.

Sutton, S., French, D.P., Hennings, S.J., Mitchell, J., Wareham, N.J., Griffin, S., Hardeman, W., Kinmonth, A.L., 2003. Eliciting salient beliefs in research on the theory of planned behaviour: The effect of question wording. Curr Psychol 22, 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-003-1019-1

Thatcher, J.B., Perrewé, P.L., 2002. An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quarterly 26, 381–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/4132314

Wang, Z., Louey, J., 2008. Economical Solution for an Easy to Use Interactive Whiteboard, in: 2008 Japan-China Joint Workshop on Frontier of Computer Science and Technology. Presented at the 2008 Japan-China Joint Workshop on Frontier of Computer Science and Technology, pp. 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1109/FCST.2008.22

Warwick, P., Mercer, N., Kershner, R., Staarman, J.K., 2010. In the mind and in the technology: The vicarious presence of the teacher in pupil’s learning of science in collaborative group activity at the interactive whiteboard. Computers & Education 55, 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.001

Way, J., Lilley, E., Johnco, S., Ruster, C., Mauric, L., Ochs, L., 2009. Interactive whiteboards and pedagogy in primary classrooms, in: Australian Association for Research in Education - Annual Conference. Canberra.

Workman, M., 2005. Social cognitive effects on information and technology Use. Journal of Information Science and Technology.

 Os autores detêm os direitos autorais e concedem ao periódico o direito de ser a primeira publicação do trabalho, bem como licenciando-o sob uma Creative Commons Attribution License que permite que terceiros compartilhem o trabalho com um reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e inicial da publicação nesta revista. Todo o conteúdo é publicado sob a licença internacional Creative Commons 4.0: Atribuição-Não-Comercial-Compartilhamento pela mesma.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.metrics##

##plugins.generic.paperbuzz.loading##